North, by Roger Hubank
The Ernest Press, 2000. ISBN 0 94815369 5
Reviewed by Lorrie Beaver Levesque
North is a novel based on the true life story of
America's attempt to join the Arctic exploration race.
Unfortunately, the country's ability to follow through and keep
the exploration team stocked with essential food and supplies
doomed them to a terrible fate. Hubank changes the names of the
true life characters, but keeps intact the psychological
shortcomings and personality conflicts of the leaders of the
expedition; Lt. Greely becomes Lt. Parish, and the surgeon Pavy
becomes Fabius in the novel. The long agonizing tragedy that
befalls the expedition is honestly portrayed and moves along at a
pace that does not become tiresome. Hubank also takes care to
employ the technique of character journal entries within the
course of the novel, which was an important aspect of the real
life expedition, and provided testimony to the men's fates, long
after they had succumbed to the elements.
The reader does not need to be familiar with the facts of the
real expedition to enjoy this carefully constructed novel. In all
honesty, however, the novel becomes more of a delight to read if
one has already read Guttridge's "Ghosts of Cape
Sabine," or is already acquainted with the Greely expedition
history and outcome. It's like hot fudge on ice cream. It just
makes it better to taste and enjoy.
All the failures of the human heart and psyche are explored in
the rendering of the expedition's disintegration in the face of
terrible cold and no survival rations, and the bureaucratic
bumbling on the home front. Hubank employs a deft and effective
touch in spending a portion of the novel on suffering at home of
the character Martha Parish. Not only does it give a chance for
the drier and less gripping legislative failures to be introduced
into the novel, it also gives the novel a female perspective that
would not normally emerge in the middle of a 19th century polar
expedition. It is a welcome technique that greatly enhances the
reading of this novel. Bravo to Mr. Hubank.
It's hard not to reflect upon what would have happened on many of
these doomed expeditions if women had been more involved in the
planning and actual packing. Less family crest silverware, and
more dry socks and tea biscuits, might have been in the knapsack
and caused a few of these gentlemen to actually return. But I
digress.
INTERVIEW WITH THE AUTHOR
LBL: How long did it take you to research NORTH? Did you have
trouble finding historical documentation living in the UK?
RH: The first germ of an idea for `a Polar novel` appears in my
notebooks, dated `September 1991`. It was sparked by a
description of A.W.Greely, in Pierre Berton`s Arctic Grail, as
`an irritable, insecure martinet.Though I`d no experience of
Arctic explorers I had known many mountaineers, and it struck me
that `an irritable, insecure martinet` would make for a highly
problematic leader of any expedition.
At the time I was still teaching in the university, as well as
working on another novel. Even so, I was drawn by the
extraordinary circumstances of Greely`s tragic story, and I
settled to read as much as I could about his expedition, and
about the Arctic generally. The Greely material was difficult to
find in the UK. Eventually I managed to borrow a copy of`Three
Years of Arctic Service`, which I photocopied, and that provided
me with a basis on which to work. (I was never able to obtain
Brainard`s books, and never saw them until I was shown them on
the shelf on a friend in Banff last October.)
So began the slow process of reading and note-taking. I collected
whatever I could in the way of books, pictures, videos and
recordings, etc - anything that might count as raw material for
the Arctic. By the autumn of 1996 I had begun work on the first
drafts of `North`, which was finished in 2000.
LBL: NORTH is very much a psychological tale. Was it easier to
write from the viewpoint of Parish or Fabius? Also, which one of
these very two different men do you feel you might have been a
friend with if they lived in the present time?
RH: Yes - it is, as you say, very much a psychological tale. For
that reason, Parish was much harder because so very much more
detailed, since I wanted to focus on his isolation, an isolation
that is partly a consequence of his role as commander, but also a
reflection of his own insecurity and inadequacy as a man.
I have known a man like Parish -- stubborn, high-principled, as
convinced of his rectitude as he seemed blind to his own
shortcomings, I did not find it easy to get on with him. I`ve
also known self-obsessed men like Fabius, single-minded,
egotistical, driven by a overwhelming desire to succeed in their
ambition, to the exclusion of all else. They, too, don`t make for
comfortable companions.
Even so, over the years in which I was engaged in this work, I
felt a growing sympathy and respect for Parish and his men, and
for the reality of the lives on which my story was based, that
they were more than simply pawns for me to push around in a
fiction; men who had been where I have not been, and suffered
what I have not suffered. That is why I dedicated the book as I
did.
LBL: How long did the actual writing of NORTH take?
RH: It took about three and a half years to finish the first
draft. Revising it for publication took a few more months.
LBL: Was it easier to write HAZARD'S WAY or NORTH? Why?
RH:`Hazard`s Way` was certainly easier (in so far as the writing
of a novel is ever easy). The history, the settings, the
attitudes and values of the characters, their speech registers,
the class structure which they represented, were all very much
more familiar.
`North`, on the other hand, really was a journey into the
unknown. Not only were there the inevitable difficulties of
handling the Arctic material, but the larger, ever-present
problem entailed by the fact that `North` was essentially an
American story written by a Brit, an outsider for whom the
complexities of nineteenth-century American history and politics,
not least the procedural tangles of Congress, might prove too
daunting. Just as problematic was the unfamiliarity (for me) of
what I might call the `cultural baggage` - habits of speech, ways
of thinking, etc. So the work went on against a constant anxiety
that I was trying to bite off more than I could chew, attempting
a task that was quite simply beyond me. For a long time I didn`t
know whether or not I would be able to finish the first draft.
Finally, there was a lingering uneasiness provoked by the story
itself, what Barry Lopez has called `the most shameful episode in
American Arctic history`. There was no way of mitigating that
`shame`, for which Congress and the Administration bore a very
large part of the responsibility. On the other hand, I`d no wish
to write something that would seem gratuitously offensive to an
American reader.
LBL: Have you been to the Arctic yourself?
RH: No. The nearest I`ve been came last October, en route for the
Banff mountain book festival. We were blessed with excellent
visibility, flying over the Greenland ice cap, of snow mountains
rising out of a white wilderness, then Baffin Bay, and Baffin
Island. I looked down on all this with a wondrous feeling that
there, at last, was the place where I`d been living in
imagination for the last few years.
Then, in Banff, I met people like Jerry Kobalenko, who`d really
been there. (Jerry`s book on Ellesmere Island, `The Horizontal
Everest`, published last year, won the Travel and Adventure award
at the Banff festival. Incidentally, `North` - though hardly
fitting into any of the categories - won a Special Jury Award at
the festival.)
LBL: I was pleased with your inclusion of Martha Parrish's
character in the novel and her own trial by fire. It was an
excellent way to place the dry facts of the desertion of the
expedition by American legislators in the framework of her
suffering and worry. Was it more difficult, as a male writer, to
write from the female perspective?
RH: Yes, it was. I knew I had to find a model, not so much of the
woman herself (at least, to start with), but of the kind of
community which had `produced` her, so to speak. In this I was
lucky, finding in the university library a wealth of stuff about
Amherst and the Dickinson family. This gave me a background out
of which to construct Matty Stevens` home in Massachusetts. Matty
herself began to emerge out of the Dickinson sisters -
intelligent, principled, morally courageous, of independent mind,
tho` constrained by the patriachal power structures of her time:
not a kind of prototype feminist (that wouldn`t have done at all)
but a woman whose isolation, suffering and powerlessness in some
way parallels that of her husband, yet who draws on her own inner
resources to maintain an essential contact with him (in spite of
their separation) and eventually to come to his aid.
I needed to know what she looked like, and again I was lucky to
come across a picture in a magazine of Thomas Eakins` portrait of
his wife, Susan (I think it`s now in the Metropolitan Museum of
Art in New York), slight, plain, the small, compact face with its
candid gaze directed at the onlooker, the large hands `she never
knew what to do with` folded in her lap - the very image I was
looking for. There was Matty. I tore out the page from the
magazine, and pinned it above my desk, to preside over my
labours. I used to talk to her when I was stuck. She`s there now
as I write this.
LBL: Have you always been fascinated with arctic exploration? Did
it start, as with many of us, with the story of the Franklin
expedition?
RH: No, my interest was first directed towards the other end of
the globe. For me the Franklin story came later. As a boy I was
roused, inevitably perhaps, by the story of Scott`s last
expedition to the South Pole, and by Shackleton. (I have a friend
who was at Dulwich, Shackleton`s old school, where they keep the
`James Caird`, the whale-boat in which he made that extraordinary
journey from Elephant Island to South Georgia). Much later I read
Roland Huntford`s book on Amunsden, which did such damage to the
Scott legend in this country. It was then that I realised what
potential the conflicts and tensions, and the clash of egos
involved in Arctic exploration might have for a novelist like
myself.