School of Management
Committee on AACSB Accreditation
.

home page
1. Year founded
2. Mission & Strategic Plan
3. Governing bodies
4. Degree authorization
5. Accreditation
6. Administration
7. Continuous Improvement
8. Enrollment & Faculty
9. Budget
10. Full time  / part time faculty workload
11. Faculty qualification criteria - mission
12. Faculty qualification criteria - general
13. (a) Faculty Intellectual Contributions and Qualifications
13. (b) Deployment of Qualified Faculty
14. Expectation for faculty intellectual contributions 
15. Methods to evaluate educational programs. 
16. Comparable business schools
17. Diversity
18. Ethics
19. Business degree programs
20. Learning goals
13a. Complete Table II and IIA 
 (available at  http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/process/process-toc.asp)
Click here to download this document in Word
Click here to send a comment on this content.


TABLE II:SUMMARY OF FACULTY QUALIFICATION, INTELLECTUAL CONTRIBUTIONS

AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES

(RE:Standards 2 & 10)



Click here to view the table.


 1. Information in this table, supplemented by information in individual faculty members’ vitae, is useful in making judgments relative to: 
•Standard 2: The pattern of types of intellectual contributions will indicate whether “the portfolio of intellectual contributions reflects the mission of the school and includes contributions from a substantial cross-section of the faculty in each  discipline.”   •Standard 10: The table as a whole will assist the judgment of whether “The faculty has, and maintains, intellectual qualification and current expertise to accomplish the mission….” 


2.Faculty should be listed alphabetically by discipline. Administrators who hold faculty rank and directly support the school’s mission should be included relative to their percent of time devoted to the mission including administrative duties.If a faculty member serves more than one discipline, list the individual only once under the primary discipline to which the individual is assigned and where his/her performance evaluation is conducted.Provide a footnote explaining the nature of the interdisciplinary responsibilities of the individual. Graduate students who have teaching responsibilities should be included in accordance with the guidance provided in Standard 10. 


3. This column should show the percent of total time devoted to teaching, research, and/or other assignment represented by the faculty member’s contribution to the school’s overall mission during the period of evaluation (i.e., the year of the self-evaluation report or other filing with AACSB International).Reasons for less than 100% might include part-time employment, shared appointment with another academic unit, or other assignments that make the faculty member partially unavailable to the school. 


4. Faculty members may be academically qualified (AQ), professionally qualified (PQ), AQ and PQ, or other.Indicate by placing “YES” in the appropriate column(s) or by leaving columns blank.Individual vitae should be provided to support this table. The “Other” category should be used for those individuals holding a faculty title but whose qualifications do not meet the criteria for academically and/or professionally qualified. A faculty member should be counted only once for use in Table IIa even if the individual is AQ and PQ.  At Rhode Island College, faculty members are considered to be AQ if they have at least one item that is PRJ or OID in the Pedagogy or Discipline areas (NEC items do not count for this – see footnote 7).  Faculty members are considered to be PQ if they have at least one item that is PRJ or OID in the Contributions to Practice area. 


5. The number of intellectual contributions should be listed in these columns.The peer reviewed journal columns marked “PRJ” should enumerate all of those intellectual contributions that have appeared in journal article form reviewed by academic and practitioner colleagues.The other intellectual contributions columns marked “OIC” should enumerate all other intellectual contributions regardless of the form of the contributions, including (but not limited to) research monographs, scholarly books, chapters in scholarly books, textbooks, proceedings from scholarly meetings, papers presented at academic or professional meetings, publicly available research working papers, papers presented at faculty research seminars, publications in trade journals, in-house journals, book reviews, written cases with instructional materials, instructional software, and other publicly available materials describing the design and implementation of new curricula or courses. Generally, intellectual contributions will exist in a publicly written form and will be available for scrutiny by academic peers and professionals, i.e., proprietary and confidential research and consulting reports do not qualify as intellectual contributions. 


6. Indicate the normal professional responsibilities the faculty member is expected to perform, e.g., (UG for undergraduate teaching; GR for graduate teaching; UG/GR for teaching at both levels; ADM for administration; RES for research; NCR for non-credit teaching; SER for service and outreach activities) A faculty member may have more than one category assigned.


7. At Rhode Island College, NEC indicates activities that are “not elsewhere classified.”  These are activities which did not result in a publicly-available written document, and can include [1] pedagogy-related: (creation of teaching aids; design and implementation of new curricula and courses; additional certificate, credential, etc., earned;  conference attendee;  conference or journal reviewer;  demonstrated and meaningful works in progress;  grants received); [2] discipline-related: (chair or participant in conference panel;  additional graduate degrees earned; editor of discipline journal); and [3] practice-related: design, creation, and/or delivery of executive education programs or courses, certificate programs or courses, etc.; completion of relevant internship or other training experience; chair or participant in professional workshop, seminar, etc.; membership in learned or professional organization; consulting, volunteer, or work activities that add field-related knowledge and skills that augment the currency and relevance of information brought to teaching and learning.


Send comments on web site to Shani Carter, at:  scarter@ric.edu
Last updated May 8, 2007.
B37F33; FFCC33; 999966; 990000