BSW Program Assessment
COUNCIL ON SOCIAL WORK EDUCATION - FORM AS 4(B)
RHODE ISLAND COLLEGE BACCALAUREATE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
Form AS 4(B): A form required for Reaffirmation, Candidacy, and ongoing compliance per AS 4.0.3.
Submitting Form AS 4 for Reaffirmation Self-Study & Candidacy Benchmarks
This form is used to assist the COA in the evaluation of the program’s compliance with the accreditation standard below:
4.0.3: The program uses Form AS 4(B) and/or Form AS 4(M) to report its most recent assessment outcomes for each program option to constituents and the public on its website and routinely up-dates (minimally every 2 years) its findings.
All programs accredited by the Council on Social Work Education’s Commission on Accreditation (COA) are required to measure and report student learning outcomes. All students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards (EPAS) and any additional competencies programs may choose to add. These holistic competencies reflect the dimensions (knowledge, values, skills, and cognitive & affective processes) of social work practice that all social workers are expected to master during their professional training.
Programs determine a percentage-based benchmark for each competency and determine an outcome-measure benchmark (minimum score) for each measure. The competency benchmark (which can differ for each competency) represents the minimum percent of students the program expects to have achieved the outcome measure benchmarks in both/all measures for each of the nine competencies. The program then determines the percentage of students that attained each outcome measure (e.g., minimum score or higher), and aggregates the percentages for both/all measures together to obtain the percentage of students demonstrating competence inclusive of two (2) or more measures. The result of aggregating both/all outcome measure percentages provides the percentage of students achieving the competency benchmark. An aggregated percentage at or above the competency benchmark is considered achievement of that competency. If the program has more than one program option, the program must report data for each program option, and also an aggregate of all program options combined to determine an overall percentage of students across all program options achieving the competency benchmark.
Posting Form AS 4 for Ongoing Compliance with AS 4.0.3
Per the requirement of CSWE COA’s recognizing body, the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), and accreditation standard 4.0.3, programs must post this form publicly on its website and routinely up-date (minimally every 2 years) its findings. Upon request, programs must provide CSWE with the weblink to the published form on the program’s website where it is accessible to the public. Data presented on the form must be collected within 2 years of today’s date at all times.
Summary of the Program’s Assessment Plan | Generalist Practice (BSW Program)
All students are assessed using a minimum of two measures on their mastery of the nine competencies that comprise the Educational Policy and Accreditation Standards of the Council on Social Work Education and any additional competencies programs may choose to add. Summarize the program’s competency-based assessment plan. Programs may add/delete rows to accurately reflect the number measures included in the data presented.
|Assessment Measure #1: (Final Field Evaluation)||Notes|
|Dimension(s) assessed:||Holistic assessment of all behaviors per competency|
|When/where students are assessed:||Spring 2023|
|Who assessed student competence:||Field Instructor/Supervisor|
|Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:||3.0 (meets expectations) out of a 4.0 likert scale|
|Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:||80% of students will achieve the minimum score of 3.0|
|Assessment Measure #2: (Knowledge Test)||Notes|
|Dimension(s) assessed:||Knowledge and cognitive processes (critical thinking)|
|When/where students are assessed:||Spring 2023|
|Who assessed student competence:||Field Seminar Faculty Instructors|
|Outcome Measure Benchmark (minimum score indicative of achievement) for Competencies 1-9:||Students will get 80% of answers correct for each competency|
|Competency Benchmark (percent of students the program expects to have achieved the minimum scores, inclusive of all measures) for Competencies 1-9:||80% of students will achieve the minimum score|
Assessment Data Collected during the Academic Year (2022-2023)
|Competency||Competency Benchmark (80%)
|Percentage of students achieving competency|
|Competency 1: Demonstrate ethical and professional behavior||
80% of students will demonstrate competence inclusive of 2 or more measures
|Competency 2: Engage diversity and difference in practice||89%|
|Competency 3: Advance human rights and social, economic and environmental justice||95%|
|Competency 4: Engage in practice informed research and research- informed practice||86%|
|Competency 5: Engage in policy practice||88%|
|Competency 6: Engagement with individuals, families, groups, organizations & communities||97%|
|Competency 7: Assessment of individuals, families, groups, organizations & communities||89%|
|Competency 8: Intervene with individuals, families,
groups, organizations & communities
|Competency 9: Evaluate practice with individuals, families, groups, organizations & communities||83%|